T32SIM: evaluating mem access via trace correctly :)

This commit is contained in:
Martin Hoffmann
2013-03-21 18:58:04 +01:00
parent b8e706b1a5
commit ff2aec5d7e
3 changed files with 42 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ int main(int argc, char** argv){
// The experiments/traces hopefully set some Breakpoints, we can react on.
// We may also provide a timeout, if a TimerListener was set wanted.
MemoryInstruction mem;
address_t ip;
// Enable T32 Tracer (if available)
@ -117,11 +116,26 @@ int main(int argc, char** argv){
// Evaluate tracing result, handle memory access event..
if((tr.evaluate() > 0) && (tr.wasDataAccess())){
// TODO: step back in trace and find program counter of the according instruction.
// ip = XXX;
fail::simulator.onMemoryAccess(&fail::simulator.getCPU(0), tr.getLatestRecord().getAddress(), /* TODO access width: */ 4, tr.getLatestRecord().isDataWrite(), ip );
MemoryInstruction mem;
T32Tracer::const_record_iterator it = tr.begin();
tr.dump();
// step back to current PC
for( ; it != tr.end(); ++it) {
if(it->isProgram() && (it->getAddress() == ip)){
break;
}
}
// find latest memory access
for( ; it != tr.end(); ++it){
// iterate records till there is a memory access..
if(it->isProgram() && meminstruction.eval(it->getAddress(), mem)){ // skip data access in between
ip = it->getAddress(); // store PC of the mem access.
break; // yay, we found a memory access.
}
}
if(mem.isValid()){ // mem is not valid, if we did not leave the for loop via the break statement.. -> no mem access found :( XXX this should not happen.
fail::simulator.onMemoryAccess(&fail::simulator.getCPU(0), tr.getLatestRecord().getAddress(), mem.getWidth(), tr.getLatestRecord().isDataWrite(), ip );
}
}
}

View File

@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ namespace fail {
MemoryInstructionAnalyzer & meminstruction = anal;
address_t ArmMemoryInstructionAnalyzer::findPrevious(address_t address){
if(m_dis.hasInstructionAt(address-2)) {
if(m_dis.hasInstructionAt(address)) {
return address;
} else if (m_dis.hasInstructionAt(address - 2)) {
return address - 2;
} else if (m_dis.hasInstructionAt(address - 4)) {
return address - 4;
} else {
return ADDR_INV;
}
@ -29,6 +29,23 @@ namespace fail {
// The Cortex M3 Lauterbach is a pain in the ass, as a Memory Watchpoint does not stop
// at the accessing instruction, but 1 or 2 instructions later.
bool ArmMemoryInstructionAnalyzer::eval_cm3(address_t address, MemoryInstruction& result){
arm_instruction inst;
uint32_t opcode =0;
address = findPrevious(address);
opcode = m_dis.disassemble(address).opcode;
// OpenOCDs thumb2_opcode evaluation is not complete yet. :(
thumb2_opcode(address, opcode, &inst);
if(inst.isMemoryAccess()){
evaluate(inst, result);
return true;
}else{
return false;
}
#if 0
arm_instruction inst;
uint32_t opcode =0;
address = findPrevious(address); // Cortex M3: memory access is at the previous instruction
@ -66,6 +83,7 @@ namespace fail {
// This can happen if we came here from anywhere, e.g. by ldr pc, [r4]
}
return false;
#endif
}
bool ArmMemoryInstructionAnalyzer::eval_ca9(address_t address, MemoryInstruction& result){
@ -81,6 +99,7 @@ namespace fail {
#define CORTEXM3
bool ArmMemoryInstructionAnalyzer::eval(address_t address, MemoryInstruction & result){
#ifdef CORTEXM3
#warning "Memory Accesses cannot be evaluated completely!"

View File

@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ bool VEZSExperiment::run()
simulator.addListenerAndResume(&l_foo);
//if(i == 0) mm.setBytes(pfoo, 4, (void*)&foo);
m_log << " Breakpoint hit! @ 0x" << std::hex << simulator.getCPU(0).getInstructionPointer() << std::endl;
m_log << " Trigger PC: 0x" << std::hex << l_foo.getTriggerInstructionPointer() << std::endl;
//m_log << " Register R3: 0x" << hex << simulator.getCPU(0).getRegisterContent(reg) << endl;
//mm.getBytes(pfoo, 4, (void*)&foo);
//m_log << " foo @ 0x"<< std::hex << pfoo << " = " << foo << std::endl;