1

Regenerate nvim config

This commit is contained in:
2024-06-02 03:29:20 +02:00
parent 75eea0c030
commit ef2e28883d
5576 changed files with 604886 additions and 503 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
name: Bug report
description: Create a report to help us improve
labels: [bug]
body:
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: |
# Before reporting
Please do the following steps before reporting an issue.
- I have updated my neovim version to latest _master_
- I have updated my plugin to the latest version
- I have run `:TSUpdate`
- I have read the [troubleshooting section](https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter#troubleshooting)
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Describe the bug
description: A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: To Reproduce
description: Steps to reproduce the behavior.
placeholder: |
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Expected behavior
description: A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Output of `:checkhealth nvim-treesitter`
render: markdown
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Output of `nvim --version`
render: text
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Additional context
description: Add any context about the problem here.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
---
name: Feature request
about: Suggest an idea for this project
title: ""
labels: enhancement
assignees: ""
---
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
**Describe the solution you'd like**
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
**Additional context**
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
name: Highlighting issue
description: Missing or incorrect highlights or you want to change the way something is highlighted
labels: [highlights]
body:
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: |
# Before reporting
Please perform the following steps before reporting an issue.
- I have updated my neovim version to latest _master_.
- I have updated my plugin to the latest version.
- I have run `:TSUpdate`.
- I have inspected the syntax tree using `:InspectTree` and made sure
that no `ERROR` nodes are in the syntax tree. nvim-treesitter can not guarantee correct highlighting in the
presence of `ERROR`s -- in this case, please report the bug directly at corresponding parser's repository. (You can find all repository URLs in [README.md](https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter#supported-languages).)
- I have used `:Inspect` to inspect which highlight groups Neovim is using and that legacy syntax highlighting is not interfering (i.e., what you are observing is actual tree-sitter highlighting).
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Describe the highlighting problem
description: A clear and concise description of what should be highlighted in a different way.
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Example snippet that causes the problem
description: Please provide an example snippet in plain text that causes the problem.
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Tree-sitter parsing result
description: |
Please provide the output of `:InspectTree` (screenshot or plain text)
with the following options enabled (pressing the key):
- `I` (name of the parsed language)
- `t` (toggle injected languages)
- `a` (show anonymous nodes)
placeholder: |
This should look somehow like this:
```
preproc_ifdef [0, 0] - [4, 6] cpp
"#ifdef" [0, 0] - [0, 6] cpp
name: identifier [0, 7] - [0, 17] cpp
preproc_def [1, 0] - [2, 0] cpp
"#define" [1, 0] - [1, 7] cpp
name: identifier [1, 8] - [1, 16] cpp
value: preproc_arg [1, 16] - [1, 27] cpp
"\n" [1, 27] - [2, 0] cpp
alternative: preproc_else [2, 0] - [4, 0] cpp
"#else" [2, 0] - [2, 5] cpp
preproc_def [3, 0] - [4, 0] cpp
"#define" [3, 0] - [3, 7] cpp
name: identifier [3, 8] - [3, 16] cpp
value: preproc_arg [3, 16] - [3, 29] cpp
```
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Example screenshot
description: |
Please provide a screenshot of the current highlighting. Please also tell us the `:h colorscheme` you are using
and how to install it. If applicable, you can also upload a screenshot with the contents of
`:Inspect`.
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Expected behavior
description: |
A clear and concise description of what you expect to be changed. You can provide screenshot of
other editors or traditional Vim highlighting that don't show this problem or show a screenshot how
nvim-treesitter highlighting would look like when a problematic query would be removed/altered.
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Output of `:checkhealth nvim-treesitter`
render: markdown
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Output of `nvim --version`
render: text
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Additional context
description: Add any context about the problem here.