Update zotero.bib

This commit is contained in:
2026-07-06 22:55:33 +02:00
parent 67929c39f4
commit 112159f893
+179
View File
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
@article{aidemarkGOOFIGenericObjectOriented,
title = {{{GOOFI}} : {{Generic Object-Oriented Fault Injection Tool}}},
author = {Aidemark, Joakim and Vinter, Jonny and Folkesson, Peter and Karlsson, Johan},
date = {2001},
abstract = {In this paper, we present a new fault injection tool called GOOFI (Generic Object-Oriented Fault Injection). GOOFI is designed to be adaptable to various target systems and different fault injection techniques. The tool is highly portable between different host platforms since it relies on the Java programming language and a SQL compatible database. The current version of the tool supports pre-runtime Software Implemented Fault Injection and Scan-Chain Implemented Fault Injection.},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/3RK6XB92/Aidemark et al. - 2001 - GOOFI Generic Object-Oriented Fault Injection Tool.pdf}
}
@inproceedings{chenImprovingJavaVirtual2005,
title = {Improving Java Virtual Machine Reliability for Memory-Constrained Embedded Systems},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on {{Design}} Automation - {{DAC}} '05},
@@ -16,6 +25,23 @@
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/FKKICG9F/Chen and Kandemir - 2005 - Improving java virtual machine reliability for memory-constrained embedded systems.pdf}
}
@inproceedings{fidalgoUsingNEXUSCompliant2006,
title = {Using {{NEXUS}} Compliant Debuggers for Real Time Fault Injection on Microprocessors},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th Annual Symposium on {{Integrated}} Circuits and Systems Design},
author = {Fidalgo, André and Gericota, Manuel and Alves, Gustavo and Ferreira, José},
date = {2006-08-28},
pages = {214--219},
publisher = {ACM},
location = {Ouro Preto MG Brazil},
doi = {10.1145/1150343.1150397},
url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1150343.1150397},
urldate = {2026-07-06},
eventtitle = {{{SBCCI06}}: 19th {{Symposium}} on {{Integrated Circuits}} and {{System Design}}},
isbn = {978-1-59593-479-6},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/LDE6FJQF/Fidalgo et al. - 2006 - Using NEXUS compliant debuggers for real time fault injection on microprocessors.pdf}
}
@article{forinVitalCodedMicroprocessor1990,
title = {Vital {{Coded Microprocessor Principles}} and {{Application}} for {{Various Transit Systems}}},
author = {Forin, P.},
@@ -33,6 +59,50 @@
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/77H4FFUQ/Forin - 1990 - Vital Coded Microprocessor Principles and Application for Various Transit Systems.pdf}
}
@inproceedings{goloubevaSofterrorDetectionUsing2003,
title = {Soft-Error Detection Using Control Flow Assertions},
booktitle = {Proceedings 18th {{IEEE Symposium}} on {{Defect}} and {{Fault Tolerance}} in {{VLSI Systems}}},
author = {Goloubeva, O. and Rebaudengo, M. and Sonza Reorda, M. and Violante, M.},
date = {2003},
pages = {581--588},
publisher = {IEEE},
location = {Boston, MA, USA},
doi = {10.1109/DFTVS.2003.1250158},
url = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1250158/},
urldate = {2026-07-06},
abstract = {Over the last years, an increasing number of safety-critical tasks have been demanded to computer systems. In this paper, a software-based approach for developing safety-critical applications is analyzed. The technique is based on the introduction of additional executable assertions to check the correct execution of the program control flow. By applying the proposed technique, several benchmark applications have been hardened against transient errors. Fault Injection campaigns have been performed to evaluate the fault detection capability of the proposed technique in comparison with state-of-the-art alternative assertionbased methods. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is far more effective than the other considered techniques in terms of fault detection capability, at the cost of a limited increase in memory requirements and in performance overhead.},
eventtitle = {Proceedings. 18th {{IEEE International Symposium}} on {{Defect}} and {{Fault Tolerance}} in {{VLSI Systems}}},
isbn = {978-0-7695-2042-1},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/WI2QDM9X/Goloubeva et al. - 2003 - Soft-error detection using control flow assertions.pdf}
}
@article{hammingErrorDetectingError,
title = {Error Detecting and Error Correcting Codes},
author = {Hamming, Richard W},
date = {1950-04},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/AYGVTSAN/Hamming - 1950 - Error detecting and error correcting codes.pdf}
}
@article{hoffmannExperiencesSoftwarebasedSofterror2016,
title = {Experiences with Software-Based Soft-Error Mitigation Using {{AN}} Codes},
author = {Hoffmann, Martin and Ulbrich, Peter and Dietrich, Christian and Schirmeier, Horst and Lohmann, Daniel and Schröder-Preikschat, Wolfgang},
date = {2016-03},
journaltitle = {Software Quality Journal},
shortjournal = {Software Qual J},
volume = {24},
number = {1},
pages = {87--113},
issn = {0963-9314, 1573-1367},
doi = {10.1007/s11219-014-9260-4},
url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11219-014-9260-4},
urldate = {2026-07-06},
abstract = {Arithmetic error coding schemes are a well known and effective technique for soft error mitigation. Although the underlying coding theory is generally a complex area of mathematics, its practical implementation is comparatively simple in general. However, compliance with the theory can be lost easily while moving towards an actual implementation, which finally jeopardizes the aspired fault-tolerance characteristics and effectiveness. In this paper, we present our experiences and lessons learned from implementing arithmetic error coding schemes (AN codes) in the context of our Combined Redundancy fault-tolerance approach. We focus on the challenges and pitfalls in the transition from maths to machine code for a binary computer from a systems perspective. Our results show, that practical misconceptions (such as the use of prime numbers) and architecture-dependent implementation glitches occur at every stage of this transition. We identify typical pitfalls and describe practical measures to find and resolve them. This allowed us to eliminate all remaining silent data corruptions in the Combined Redundancy framework, which we validated by an extensive fault-injection campaign covering the entire fault space of 1-bit and 2-bit errors.},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/UU2JZ5HL/Hoffmann et al. - 2016 - Experiences with software-based soft-error mitigation using AN codes.pdf}
}
@inproceedings{hoffmannPractitionersGuideSoftwareBased2014,
title = {A {{Practitioner}}'s {{Guide}} to {{Software-Based Soft-Error Mitigation Using AN-Codes}}},
booktitle = {2014 {{IEEE}} 15th {{International Symposium}} on {{High-Assurance Systems Engineering}}},
@@ -51,6 +121,33 @@
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/CY3ULLCA/Hoffmann et al. - 2014 - A Practitioner's Guide to Software-Based Soft-Error Mitigation Using AN-Codes.pdf}
}
@inproceedings{kuvaiskiiAmpampx0394EncodingPracticalEncoded2015,
title = {Delta-{{Encoding}}: {{Practical Encoded Processing}}},
shorttitle = {\&Amp;\#x0394;-{{Encoding}}},
booktitle = {2015 45th {{Annual IEEE}}/{{IFIP International Conference}} on {{Dependable Systems}} and {{Networks}}},
author = {Kuvaiskii, Dmitrii and Fetzer, Christof},
date = {2015-06},
pages = {13--24},
publisher = {IEEE},
location = {Rio de Janeiro, Brazil},
doi = {10.1109/DSN.2015.20},
url = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7266834},
urldate = {2026-07-06},
abstract = {Transient and permanent errors in memory and CPUs occur with alarming frequency. Although most of these errors are masked at the hardware level or result in crashes, a non-negligible number of them leads to Silent Data Corruptions (SDCs), i.e., incorrect results of computations. Safety-critical programs require a very high level of confidence that such faults are detected and not propagated to the outside. Unfortunately, state-of-the-art fault detection techniques generally assume a limited Single Event Upset fault model, concentrating only on transient faults.},
eventtitle = {2015 45th {{Annual IEEE}}/{{IFIP International Conference}} on {{Dependable Systems}} and {{Networks}} ({{DSN}})},
isbn = {978-1-4799-8629-3},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/XBMRFFTE/Kuvaiskii and Fetzer - 2015 - Delta-Encoding Practical Encoded Processing.pdf}
}
@thesis{munkSoftwareFaultToleranceMechanism,
title = {A Software Fault-Tolerance Mechanism for Mixed-Critical Real-Time Applications on Consumer-Grade Many-Core Processors},
author = {Munk, Peter},
date = {2016-07},
langid = {ngerman},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/8QKA739L/Munk - 2016 - A Software Fault-Tolerance Mechanism for Mixed-Critical Real-Time Applications on Consumer-Grade Man.pdf}
}
@article{polednaReplicaDeterminismDistributed1994,
title = {Replica Determinism in Distributed Real-Time Systems: {{A}} Brief Survey},
shorttitle = {Replica Determinism in Distributed Real-Time Systems},
@@ -70,6 +167,33 @@
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/DB8GU2TK/Poledna - 1994 - Replica determinism in distributed real-time systems A brief survey.pdf}
}
@article{raabSafeSoftwareProcessing,
title = {Safe Software Processing by Concurrent Execution in a Real-Time Operating System},
author = {Raab, Peter and Kramer, Stefan and Mottok, Jurgen and Meier, Hans and Racek, Stanislav},
date = {2011-09},
abstract = {The requirements for safety-related software systems increases rapidly. To detect arbitrary hardware faults, there are applicable coding mechanism, that add redundancy to the software. In this way it is possible to replace conventional multi-channel hardware and so reduce costs. Arithmetic codes are one possibility of coded processing and are used in this approach. A further approach to increase fault tolerance is the multiple execution of certain critical parts of software. This kind of time redundancy is easily realized by the parallel processing in an operating system. Faults in the program flow can be monitored. No special compilers, that insert additional generated code into the existing program, are required. The usage of multi-core processors would further increase the performance of such multi-channel software systems. In this paper we present the approach of program flow monitoring combined with coded processing, which is encapsulated in a library of coded data types. The program flow monitoring is indirectly realized by means of an operating system.},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/MJAVLTNB/Raab et al. - 2011 - Safe software processing by concurrent execution in a real-time operating system.pdf}
}
@inproceedings{rebaudengoSofterrorDetectionSoftware1999,
title = {Soft-Error Detection through Software Fault-Tolerance Techniques},
booktitle = {Proceedings 1999 {{IEEE International Symposium}} on {{Defect}} and {{Fault Tolerance}} in {{VLSI Systems}} ({{EFT}}'99)},
author = {Rebaudengo, M. and Sonza Reorda, M. and Torchiano, M. and Violante, M.},
date = {1999},
pages = {210--218},
publisher = {IEEE Comput. Soc},
location = {Albuquerque, NM, USA},
doi = {10.1109/DFTVS.1999.802887},
url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/802887/},
urldate = {2026-07-06},
abstract = {The paper describes a systematic approach for automatically introducing data and code redundancy into an existing program written using a high-level language. The transformations aim at making the program able to detect most of the soft-errors affecting data and code, independently of the Error Detection Mechanisms (EDMs) possibly implemented by the hardware. Since the transformations can be automatically applied as a pre-compilation phase, the programmer is freed from the cost and responsibility of introducing suitable EDMs in its code. Preliminary experimental results are reported, showing the fault coverage obtained by the method, as well as some figures concerning the slow-down and code size increase it causes.},
eventtitle = {1999 {{IEEE International Symposium}} on {{Defect}} and {{Fault Tolerance}} in {{VLSI Systems}}},
isbn = {978-0-7695-0325-7},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/HFQUUT6L/Rebaudengo et al. - 1999 - Soft-error detection through software fault-tolerance techniques.pdf}
}
@incollection{schiffelANBANBDmemEncodingDetecting2010,
title = {{{ANB-}} and {{ANBDmem-Encoding}}: {{Detecting Hardware Errors}} in {{Software}}},
shorttitle = {{{ANB-}} and {{ANBDmem-Encoding}}},
@@ -103,6 +227,24 @@
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/7BXMSTFW/Hardware_Error_Detection_Using_AN_Codes.pdf}
}
@incollection{schirmeierDependabilityAspectsConfigurable2021,
title = {Dependability {{Aspects}} in {{Configurable Embedded Operating Systems}}},
booktitle = {Dependable {{Embedded Systems}}},
author = {Schirmeier, Horst and Borchert, Christoph and Hoffmann, Martin and Dietrich, Christian and Martens, Arthur and Kapitza, Rüdiger and Lohmann, Daniel and Spinczyk, Olaf},
editor = {Henkel, Jörg and Dutt, Nikil},
date = {2021},
pages = {85--116},
publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
location = {Cham},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-52017-5_4},
url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-52017-5_4},
urldate = {2026-07-06},
abstract = {Abstract As all conceptual layers in the software stack depend on the operating system (OS) to reliably provide resource-management services and isolation, it can be considered the “reliable computing base” that must be hardened for correct operation under fault models such as transient hardware faults in the memory hierarchy. In this chapter, we approach the problem of system-software hardening in three complementary scenarios. (1) We address the following research question: Where do the general reliability limits of static system-software stacks lie, if designed from scratch with reliability as a first-class design goal? In order to reduce the proverbial “attack surface” as far as possible, we harness static application knowledge from an AUTOSAR-compliant task set, and protect the whole OS kernel with AN-encoding. This static approach yields an extremely reliable software system, but is constrained to specific application domains. (2) We investigate how reliable a dynamic COTS embedded OS can become if hardened with programming-language and compiler-based fault-tolerance techniques. We show that aspect-oriented programming is an appropriate means to encapsulate generic software-implemented hardware fault tolerance mechanisms that can be application-specifically applied to a selection of OS components. (3) We examine how system-software stacks can survive even more adverse fault models like whole-system outages, using emerging persistent memory (PM) technology as a vehicle for state conservation. Our findings include that software transactional memory facilitates maintaining consistent state within PM and allows fast recovery.},
isbn = {978-3-030-52016-8 978-3-030-52017-5},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/WAVR4R62/Schirmeier et al. - 2021 - Dependability Aspects in Configurable Embedded Operating Systems.pdf}
}
@thesis{schirmeierEfficientFaultInjectionbasedAssessment,
type = {phdthesis},
title = {Efficient {{Fault-Injection-based Assessment}} of {{Software-Implemented Hardware Fault Tolerance}}},
@@ -142,6 +284,43 @@
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/G9SATNLR/Schirmeier et al. - FAIL Towards a Versatile Fault-Injection Experiment Framework.pdf}
}
@article{schusterDemystifyingSoftErrorMitigation2017,
title = {Demystifying {{Soft-Error Mitigation}} by {{Control-Flow Checking}} -- {{A New Perspective}} on Its {{Effectiveness}}},
author = {Schuster, Simon and Ulbrich, Peter and Stilkerich, Isabella and Dietrich, Christian and SchröDer-Preikschat, Wolfgang},
date = {2017-10-31},
journaltitle = {ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems},
shortjournal = {ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst.},
volume = {16},
pages = {1--19},
issn = {1539-9087, 1558-3465},
doi = {10.1145/3126503},
url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3126503},
urldate = {2026-07-06},
abstract = {Soft errors are a challenging and urging problem in the domain of safety-critical embedded systems. For decades, checking schemes have been investigated and improved to mitigate soft-error effects for the class of control-flow faults, with current industrial standards strongly recommending their use. However, reality looks different: Taking a systems perspective, we implemented four representative Control-Flow Checking (CFC) schemes and put them through their paces in 396 fault-injection campaigns. In contrast to previous work, which typically relied on probability-based vulnerability metrics, we accounted for the influence of memory and time overheads on the fault-space dimensions and applied those in full-scan fault injections. This change in procedure alone severely degraded the perceived effectiveness of CFC. In addition, we expanded the perspective to data-flow faults and their influence on the overall susceptibility, an aspect that so far has been largely ignored. Our results suggest that, without accompanying measures, any improvement regarding control-flow faults is dominated by the increase in data faults caused by the increased attack surface in terms of memory and runtime overhead. Moreover, CFC performance less depended on the detection capabilities than on general aspects of the concrete binary compilation and execution. In conclusion, incorporating CFC is not as straightforward as often assumed and the vulnerability of systems with hardened control-flow may in many cases even be increased by the schemes themselves.},
issue = {5s},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/BLKUCBAD/Schuster et al. - 2017 - Demystifying Soft-Error Mitigation by Control-Flow Checking -- A New Perspective on its Effectivenes.pdf}
}
@inproceedings{skarinGOOFI2ToolExperimental2010,
title = {{{GOOFI-2}}: {{A}} Tool for Experimental Dependability Assessment},
shorttitle = {{{GOOFI-2}}},
booktitle = {2010 {{IEEE}}/{{IFIP International Conference}} on {{Dependable Systems}} \& {{Networks}} ({{DSN}})},
author = {Skarin, Daniel and Barbosa, Raul and Karlsson, Johan},
date = {2010-06},
pages = {557--562},
publisher = {IEEE},
location = {Chicago, IL},
doi = {10.1109/DSN.2010.5544265},
url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5544265/},
urldate = {2026-07-06},
abstract = {This paper presentsGOOFI-2, a comprehensive fault in jection tool for experimental dependability assessment of embedded systems. The tool includes a large number of ex tensions and improvements over its predecessor, GOOF!. These include support for three widely used fault injection techniques, two target processors, and a variety of new features for storing, disseminating and analyzing experi mental data. We report on our experiences and lessons learned from the use and development ofGOOFI-2. In par ticular, we compare and discuss properties of three fault injection techniques: Nexus-based, exception-based and instrumentation-based injection. The comparison relies on several sets of experiments with two target processors, Freescale's MPC565 and MPC5554.},
eventtitle = {2010 {{IEEE}}/{{IFIP International Conference}} on {{Dependable Systems}} \& {{Networks}} ({{DSN}})},
isbn = {978-1-4244-7500-1 978-1-4244-7501-8},
langid = {english},
file = {/home/christoph/Notes/Zotero/storage/2HMSUPZM/Skarin et al. - 2010 - GOOFI-2 A tool for experimental dependability assessment.pdf}
}
@book{slettenWebAssemblyDefinitiveGuide2021,
title = {{{WebAssembly}}: The Definitive Guide: Safe, Fast, and Portable Code},
shorttitle = {{{WebAssembly}}},